# Newton's identities

In mathematics, **Newton's identities**, also known as the **Girard–Newton formulae**, give relations between two types of symmetric polynomials, namely between power sums and elementary symmetric polynomials. Evaluated at the roots of a monic polynomial *P* in one variable, they allow expressing the sums of the *k*-th powers of all roots of *P* (counted with their multiplicity) in terms of the coefficients of *P*, without actually finding those roots. These identities were found by Isaac Newton around 1666, apparently in ignorance of earlier work (1629) by Albert Girard. They have applications in many areas of mathematics, including Galois theory, invariant theory, group theory, combinatorics, as well as further applications outside mathematics, including general relativity.

Let *x*_{1}, ..., *x*_{n} be variables, denote for *k* ≥ 1 by *p*_{k}(*x*_{1}, ..., *x*_{n}) the *k*-th **power sum**:

and for *k* ≥ 0 denote by *e*_{k}(*x*_{1}, ..., *x*_{n}) the elementary symmetric polynomial (that is, the sum of all distinct products of *k* distinct variables), so

The form and validity of these equations do not depend on the number *n* of variables (although the point where the left-hand side becomes 0 does, namely after the *n*-th identity), which makes it possible to state them as identities in the ring of symmetric functions. In that ring one has

and so on; here the left-hand sides never become zero.
These equations allow to recursively express the *e*_{i} in terms of the *p*_{k}; to be able to do the inverse, one may rewrite them as

Formulating polynomials in this way is useful in using the method of Delves and Lyness^{[1]} to find the zeros of an analytic function.

The Newton identities now relate the traces of the powers *A*^{k} to the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of *A*. Using them in reverse to express the elementary symmetric polynomials in terms of the power sums, they can be used to find the characteristic polynomial by computing only the powers *A*^{k} and their traces.

This computation requires computing the traces of matrix powers *A*^{k} and solving a triangular system of equations. Both can be done in complexity class NC (solving a triangular system can be done by divide-and-conquer). Therefore, characteristic polynomial of a matrix can be computed in NC. By the Cayley–Hamilton theorem, every matrix satisfies its characteristic polynomial, and a simple transformation allows to find the adjugate matrix in NC.

Rearranging the computations into an efficient form leads to the *Faddeev–LeVerrier algorithm* (1840), a fast parallel implementation of it is due to L. Csanky (1976). Its disadvantage is that it requires division by integers, so in general the field should have characteristic 0.

The Newton identities also permit expressing the elementary symmetric polynomials in terms of the power sum symmetric polynomials, showing that any symmetric polynomial can also be expressed in the power sums. In fact the first *n* power sums also form an algebraic basis for the space of symmetric polynomials.

There are a number of (families of) identities that, while they should be distinguished from Newton's identities, are very closely related to them.

Denoting by *h*_{k} the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial that is the sum of all monomials of degree *k*, the power sum polynomials also satisfy identities similar to Newton's identities, but not involving any minus signs. Expressed as identities of in the ring of symmetric functions, they read

valid for all n ≥ *k* ≥ 1. Contrary to Newton's identities, the left-hand sides do not become zero for large *k*, and the right-hand sides contain ever more non-zero terms. For the first few values of *k*, one has

These relations can be justified by an argument analogous to the one by comparing coefficients in power series given above, based in this case on the generating function identity

Proofs of Newton's identities, like these given below, cannot be easily adapted to prove these variants of those identities.

As mentioned, Newton's identities can be used to recursively express elementary symmetric polynomials in terms of power sums. Doing so requires the introduction of integer denominators, so it can be done in the ring Λ_{Q} of symmetric functions with rational coefficients:

where the *B _{n}* is the complete exponential Bell polynomial. This expression also leads to the following identity for generating functions:

Applied to a monic polynomial, these formulae express the coefficients in terms of the power sums of the roots: replace each *e*_{i} by *a*_{i} and each *p*_{k} by *s*_{k}.

The analogous relations involving complete homogeneous symmetric polynomials can be similarly developed, giving equations

and so forth, in which there are only plus signs. In terms of the complete Bell polynomial,

One may also use Newton's identities to express power sums in terms of elementary symmetric polynomials, which does not introduce denominators:

The first four formulas were obtained by Albert Girard in 1629 (thus before Newton).^{[3]}

This can be conveniently stated in terms of ordinary Bell polynomials as

which is analogous to the Bell polynomial *exponential* generating function given in the previous subsection.

The multiple summation formula above can be proved by considering the following inductive step:

Expressing power sums in terms of complete homogeneous symmetric polynomialsFinally one may use the variant identities involving complete homogeneous symmetric polynomials similarly to express power sums in term of them:

One can obtain explicit formulas for the above expressions in the form of determinants, by considering the first *n* of Newton's identities (or it counterparts for the complete homogeneous polynomials) as linear equations in which the elementary symmetric functions are known and the power sums are unknowns (or vice versa), and apply Cramer's rule to find the solution for the final unknown. For instance taking Newton's identities in the form

Each of Newton's identities can easily be checked by elementary algebra; however, their validity in general needs a proof. Here are some possible derivations.

One can obtain the *k*-th Newton identity in *k* variables by substitution into

where the terms for *i* = 0 were taken out of the sum because *p*_{0} is (usually) not defined. This equation immediately gives the *k*-th Newton identity in *k* variables. Since this is an identity of symmetric polynomials (homogeneous) of degree *k*, its validity for any number of variables follows from its validity for *k* variables. Concretely, the identities in *n* < *k* variables can be deduced by setting *k* − *n* variables to zero. The *k*-th Newton identity in *n* > *k* variables contains more terms on both sides of the equation than the one in *k* variables, but its validity will be assured if the coefficients of any monomial match. Because no individual monomial involves more than *k* of the variables, the monomial will survive the substitution of zero for some set of *n* − *k* (other) variables, after which the equality of coefficients is one that arises in the *k*-th Newton identity in *k* (suitably chosen) variables.

Another derivation can be obtained by computations in the ring of formal power series *R*[[*t*]], where *R* is **Z**[*x*_{1},..., *x*_{n}], the ring of polynomials in *n* variables *x*_{1},..., *x*_{n} over the integers.

and "reversing the polynomials" by substituting 1/*t* for *t* and then multiplying both sides by *t*^{n} to remove negative powers of *t*, gives

(the above computation should be performed in the field of fractions of *R*[[*t*]]; alternatively, the identity can be obtained simply by evaluating the product on the left side)

Swapping sides and expressing the *a*_{i} as the elementary symmetric polynomials they stand for gives the identity

One formally differentiates both sides with respect to *t*, and then (for convenience) multiplies by *t*, to obtain

where the polynomial on the right hand side was first rewritten as a rational function in order to be able to factor out a product out of the summation, then the fraction in the summand was developed as a series in *t*, using the formula

and finally the coefficient of each *t* ^{j} was collected, giving a power sum. (The series in *t* is a formal power series, but may alternatively be thought of as a series expansion for *t* sufficiently close to 0, for those more comfortable with that; in fact one is not interested in the function here, but only in the coefficients of the series.) Comparing coefficients of *t*^{k} on both sides one obtains

The following derivation, given essentially in (Mead, 1992), is formulated in the ring of symmetric functions for clarity (all identities are independent of the number of variables). Fix some *k* > 0, and define the symmetric function *r*(*i*) for 2 ≤ *i* ≤ *k* as the sum of all distinct monomials of degree *k* obtained by multiplying one variable raised to the power *i* with *k* − *i* distinct other variables (this is the monomial symmetric function *m*_{γ} where γ is a hook shape (*i*,1,1,...,1)). In particular *r*(*k*) = *p*_{k}; for *r*(1) the description would amount to that of *e*_{k}, but this case was excluded since here monomials no longer have any distinguished variable. All products *p*_{i}*e*_{k−i} can be expressed in terms of the *r*(*j*) with the first and last case being somewhat special. One has

since each product of terms on the left involving distinct variables contributes to *r*(*i*), while those where the variable from *p*_{i} already occurs among the variables of the term from *e*_{k−i} contributes to *r*(*i* + 1), and all terms on the right are so obtained exactly once. For *i* = *k* one multiplies by *e*_{0} = 1, giving trivially

Finally the product *p*_{1}*e*_{k−1} for *i* = 1 gives contributions to *r*(*i* + 1) = *r*(2) like for other values *i* < *k*, but the remaining contributions produce *k* times each monomial of *e*_{k}, since any one of the variables may come from the factor *p*_{1}; thus

The *k*-th Newton identity is now obtained by taking the alternating sum of these equations, in which all terms of the form *r*(*i*) cancel out.

A short combinatorial proof of Newton's Identities is given in (Zeilberger, 1984)^{[5]}