# Free object

In mathematics, the idea of a **free object** is one of the basic concepts of abstract algebra. It is a part of universal algebra, in the sense that it relates to all types of algebraic structure (with finitary operations). It also has a formulation in terms of category theory, although this is in yet more abstract terms. Examples include free groups, tensor algebras, or free lattices. Informally, a free object over a set *A* can be thought of as being a "generic" algebraic structure over *A*: the only equations that hold between elements of the free object are those that follow from the defining axioms of the algebraic structure.

Free objects are the direct generalization to categories of the notion of basis in a vector space. A linear function *u* : *E*_{1} → *E*_{2} between vector spaces is entirely determined by its values on a basis of the vector space *E*_{1}. The following definition translates this to any category.

A concrete category is a category that is equipped with a faithful functor to **Set**, the category of sets. Let *C* be a concrete category with faithful functor *F* : *C* → **Set**. Let *X* be an object in **Set** (that is, *X* is a set, here called a *basis*), let *A* be an object in **C**, and let *i* : *X* → *F*(*A*) be an injective map between the sets *X* and *F*(*A*) (called the *canonical insertion*). Then *A* is said to be the **free object on X** (with respect to

*i*) if and only if it satisfies the following universal property:

In this way the free functor that builds the free object *A* from the set *X* becomes left adjoint to the forgetful functor.

The creation of free objects proceeds in two steps. For algebras that conform to the associative law, the first step is to consider the collection of all possible words formed from an alphabet. Then one imposes a set of equivalence relations upon the words, where the relations are the defining relations of the algebraic object at hand. The free object then consists of the set of equivalence classes.

A simpler example are the free monoids. The free monoid on a set *X*, is the monoid of all finite strings using *X* as alphabet, with operation concatenation of strings. The identity is the empty string. In essence, the free monoid is simply the set of all words, with no equivalence relations imposed. This example is developed further in the article on the Kleene star.

In the general case, the algebraic relations need not be associative, in which case the starting point is not the set of all words, but rather, strings punctuated with parentheses, which are used to indicate the non-associative groupings of letters. Such a string may equivalently be represented by a binary tree or a free magma; the leaves of the tree are the letters from the alphabet.

The algebraic relations may then be general arities or finitary relations on the leaves of the tree. Rather than starting with the collection of all possible parenthesized strings, it can be more convenient to start with the Herbrand universe. Properly describing or enumerating the contents of a free object can be easy or difficult, depending on the particular algebraic object in question. For example, the free group in two generators is easily described. By contrast, little or nothing is known about the structure of free Heyting algebras in more than one generator.^{[1]} The problem of determining if two different strings belong to the same equivalence class is known as the word problem.

As the examples suggest, free objects look like constructions from syntax; one may reverse that to some extent by saying that major uses of syntax can be explained and characterised as free objects, in a way that makes apparently heavy 'punctuation' explicable (and more memorable).^{[clarification needed]}

The most general setting for a free object is in category theory, where one defines a functor, the **free functor**, that is the left adjoint to the forgetful functor.

There are general existence theorems that apply; the most basic of them guarantees that

Here, a variety is a synonym for a finitary algebraic category, thus implying that the set of relations are finitary, and *algebraic* because it is monadic over **Set**.

Other types of forgetfulness also give rise to objects quite like free objects, in that they are left adjoint to a forgetful functor, not necessarily to sets.

For example, the tensor algebra construction on a vector space is the left adjoint to the functor on associative algebras that ignores the algebra structure. It is therefore often also called a free algebra. Likewise the symmetric algebra and exterior algebra are free symmetric and anti-symmetric algebras on a vector space.