# Logical biconditional

Semantically, the only case where a logical biconditional is different from a material conditional is the case where the hypothesis is false but the conclusion is true. In this case, the result is true for the conditional, but false for the biconditional.^{[1]}

In the conceptual interpretation, *P* = *Q* means "All P's are Q's and all Q's are P's". In other words, the sets P and Q coincide: they are identical. However, this does not mean that P and Q need to have the same meaning (e.g., P could be "equiangular trilateral" and Q could be "equilateral triangle"). When phrased as a sentence, the antecedent is the *subject* and the consequent is the *predicate* of a universal affirmative proposition (e.g., in the phrase "all men are mortal", "men" is the subject and "mortal" is the predicate).

When both members of the biconditional are propositions, it can be separated into two conditionals, of which one is called a *theorem* and the other its *reciprocal*.^{[citation needed]} Thus whenever a theorem and its reciprocal are true, we have a biconditional. A simple theorem gives rise to an implication, whose antecedent is the *hypothesis* and whose consequent is the *thesis* of the theorem.

It is often said that the hypothesis is the *sufficient condition* of the thesis, and that the thesis is the *necessary condition* of the hypothesis. That is, it is sufficient that the hypothesis be true for the thesis to be true, while it is necessary that the thesis be true if the hypothesis were true. When a theorem and its reciprocal are true, its hypothesis is said to be the necessary and sufficient condition of the thesis. That is, the hypothesis is both the cause and the consequence of the thesis at the same time.

Logical equality (also known as biconditional) is an operation on two logical values, typically the values of two propositions, that produces a value of *true* if and only if both operands are false or both operands are true.^{[1]}

or may be interpreted as saying that all *x _{i}* are

*jointly true or jointly false*:

As it turns out, these two statements are only the same—when zero or two arguments are involved. In fact, the following truth tables only show the same bit pattern in the line with no argument and in the lines with two arguments:

The left Venn diagram below, and the lines *(AB )* in these matrices represent the same operation.

**Distributivity:** Biconditional doesn't distribute over any binary function (not even itself), but logical disjunction distributes over biconditional.

**Falsehood-preserving: No**

When all inputs are false, the output is not false.

Like all connectives in first-order logic, the biconditional has rules of inference that govern its use in formal proofs.

Biconditional introduction allows one to infer that if B follows from A and A follows from B, then A if and only if B.

For example, from the statements "if I'm breathing, then I'm alive" and "if I'm alive, then I'm breathing", it can be inferred that "I'm breathing if and only if I'm alive" or equivalently, "I'm alive if and only if I'm breathing." Or more schematically:

Biconditional elimination allows one to infer a conditional from a biconditional: if A ↔ B is true, then one may infer either A → B, or B → A.

For example, if it is true that I'm breathing if and only if I'm alive, then it's true that *if* I'm breathing, then I'm alive; likewise, it's true that *if* I'm alive, then I'm breathing. Or more schematically:

One unambiguous way of stating a biconditional in plain English is to adopt the form "*b* if *a* and *a* if *b*"—if the standard form "*a* if and only if *b*" is not used. Slightly more formally, one could also say that "*b* implies *a* and *a* implies *b*", or "*a* is necessary and sufficient for *b*". The plain English "if'" may sometimes be used as a biconditional (especially in the context of a mathematical definition^{[6]}). In which case, one must take into consideration the surrounding context when interpreting these words.

For example, the statement "I'll buy you a new wallet if you need one" may be interpreted as a biconditional, since the speaker doesn't intend a valid outcome to be buying the wallet whether or not the wallet is needed (as in a conditional). However, "it is cloudy if it is raining" is generally not meant as a biconditional, since it can still be cloudy even if it is not raining.

*This article incorporates material from Biconditional on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.*