# Baire category theorem

The **Baire category theorem** (BCT) is an important result in general topology and functional analysis. The theorem has two forms, each of which gives sufficient conditions for a topological space to be a Baire space (a topological space such that the intersection of countably many dense open sets is still dense).

Versions of Baire category theorem were first proved independently in 1897 and 1899 by Osgood and Baire respectively. This theorem says that every complete metric space is a Baire space.^{[1]}

Neither of these statements directly implies the other, since there are complete metric spaces that are not locally compact (the irrational numbers with the metric defined below; also, any Banach space of infinite dimension), and there are locally compact Hausdorff spaces that are not metrizable (for instance, any uncountable product of non-trivial compact Hausdorff spaces is such; also, several function spaces used in functional analysis; the uncountable Fort space). See Steen and Seebach in the references below.

This formulation is equivalent to BCT1 and is sometimes more useful in applications.
Also: if a non-empty complete metric space is the countable union of closed sets, then one of these closed sets has *non-empty* interior.

The proof of **BCT1** for arbitrary complete metric spaces requires some form of the axiom of choice; and in fact BCT1 is equivalent over ZF to the axiom of dependent choice, a weak form of the axiom of choice.^{[3]}

**BCT1** is used in functional analysis to prove the open mapping theorem, the closed graph theorem and the uniform boundedness principle.

By **BCT2**, every finite-dimensional Hausdorff manifold is a Baire space, since it is locally compact and Hausdorff. This is so even for non-paracompact (hence nonmetrizable) manifolds such as the long line.

**BCT** is used to prove Hartogs's theorem, a fundamental result in the theory of several complex variables.

**BCT3** is used to prove that a Banach space cannot have countably infinite dimension.

There is an alternative proof by M. Baker for the proof of the theorem using Choquet's game.^{[5]}