# Tensor

In mathematics, a **tensor** is an algebraic object^{[clarification needed]} that describes a multilinear relationship between sets of algebraic objects related to a vector space. Objects that tensors may map between include vectors and scalars, and even other tensors. There are many types of tensors, including scalars and vectors (which are the simplest tensors), dual vectors, multilinear maps between vector spaces, and even some operations such as the dot product. Tensors are defined independent of any basis, although they are often referred to by their components in a basis related to a particular coordinate system.

Tensors have become important in physics because they provide a concise mathematical framework for formulating and solving physics problems in areas such as mechanics (stress, elasticity, fluid mechanics, moment of inertia, ...), electrodynamics (electromagnetic tensor, Maxwell tensor, permittivity, magnetic susceptibility, ...), or general relativity (stress–energy tensor, curvature tensor, ...) and others. In applications, it is common to study situations in which a different tensor can occur at each point of an object; for example the stress within an object may vary from one location to another. This leads to the concept of a tensor field. In some areas, tensor fields are so ubiquitous that they are often simply called "tensors".

Tullio Levi-Civita and Gregorio Ricci-Curbastro popularised tensors in 1900 – continuing the earlier work of Bernhard Riemann and Elwin Bruno Christoffel and others – as part of the *absolute differential calculus*. The concept enabled an alternative formulation of the intrinsic differential geometry of a manifold in the form of the Riemann curvature tensor.^{[1]}

Although seemingly different, the various approaches to defining tensors describe the same geometric concept using different language and at different levels of abstraction.

A tensor may be represented as an array (potentially multidimensional). Just as a vector in an n-dimensional space is represented by a one-dimensional array with n components with respect to a given basis, any tensor with respect to a basis is represented by a multidimensional array. For example, a linear operator is represented in a basis as a two-dimensional square *n* × *n* array. The numbers in the multidimensional array are known as the *scalar components* of the tensor or simply its *components*. They are denoted by indices giving their position in the array, as subscripts and superscripts, following the symbolic name of the tensor. For example, the components of an order 2 tensor T could be denoted *T*_{ij} , where i and j are indices running from 1 to n, or also by *T* ^{i}_{j}. Whether an index is displayed as a superscript or subscript depends on the transformation properties of the tensor, described below. Thus while *T*_{ij} and *T* ^{i}_{j} can both be expressed as *n* by *n* matrices, and are numerically related via index juggling, the difference in their transformation laws indicates it would be improper to add them together. The total number of indices required to identify each component uniquely is equal to the dimension of the array, and is called the *order*, *degree* or *rank* of the tensor. However, the term "rank" generally has another meaning in the context of matrices and tensors.

Here *R*^{ j}_{i} are the entries of the change of basis matrix, and in the rightmost expression the summation sign was suppressed: this is the Einstein summation convention, which will be used throughout this article.^{[Note 1]} The components *v*^{i} of a column vector **v** transform with the inverse of the matrix *R*,

where the hat denotes the components in the new basis. This is called a *contravariant* transformation law, because the vector components transform by the *inverse* of the change of basis. In contrast, the components, *w*_{i}, of a covector (or row vector), **w** transform with the matrix *R* itself,

This is called a *covariant* transformation law, because the covector components transforms by the *same matrix* as the change of basis matrix. The components of a more general tensor transform by some combination of covariant and contravariant transformations, with one transformation law for each index. If the transformation matrix of an index is the inverse matrix of the basis transformation, then the index is called *contravariant* and is conventionally denoted with an upper index (superscript). If the transformation matrix of an index is the basis transformation itself, then the index is called *covariant* and is denoted with a lower index (subscript).

Combinations of covariant and contravariant components with the same index allow us to express geometric invariants. For example, the fact that a vector is the same object in different coordinate systems can be captured by the following equations, using the formulas defined above:

The transformation law for an order *p* + *q* tensor with *p* contravariant indices and *q* covariant indices is thus given as,

Here the primed indices denote components in the new coordinates, and the unprimed indices denote the components in the old coordinates. Such a tensor is said to be of order or *type* (*p*, *q*). The terms "order", "type", "rank", "valence", and "degree" are all sometimes used for the same concept. Here, the term "order" or "total order" will be used for the total dimension of the array (or its generalization in other definitions), *p* + *q* in the preceding example, and the term "type" for the pair giving the number of contravariant and covariant indices. A tensor of type (*p*, *q*) is also called a (*p*, *q*)-tensor for short.

**Definition.** A tensor of type (*p*, *q*) is an assignment of a multidimensional array

to each basis **f** = (**e**_{1}, ..., **e**_{n}) of an *n*-dimensional vector space such that, if we apply the change of basis

The definition of a tensor as a multidimensional array satisfying a transformation law traces back to the work of Ricci.^{[1]}

A downside to the definition of a tensor using the multidimensional array approach is that it is not apparent from the definition that the defined object is indeed basis independent, as is expected from an intrinsically geometric object. Although it is possible to show that transformation laws indeed ensure independence from the basis, sometimes a more intrinsic definition is preferred. One approach that is common in differential geometry is to define tensors relative to a fixed (finite-dimensional) vector space *V*, which is usually taken to be a particular vector space of some geometrical significance like the tangent space to a manifold.^{[5]} In this approach, a type (*p*, *q*) tensor *T* is defined as a multilinear map,

where *V*^{∗} is the corresponding dual space of covectors, which is linear in each of its arguments. The above assumes *V* is a vector space over the real numbers, **ℝ**. More generally, *V* can be taken over any field *F* (e.g. the complex numbers), with *F* replacing **ℝ** as the codomain of the multilinear maps.

a (*p* + *q*)-dimensional array of components can be obtained. A different choice of basis will yield different components. But, because *T* is linear in all of its arguments, the components satisfy the tensor transformation law used in the multilinear array definition. The multidimensional array of components of *T* thus form a tensor according to that definition. Moreover, such an array can be realized as the components of some multilinear map *T*. This motivates viewing multilinear maps as the intrinsic objects underlying tensors.

In viewing a tensor as a multilinear map, it is conventional to identify the double dual *V*^{∗∗} of the vector space *V*, i.e., the space of linear functionals on the dual vector space *V*^{∗}, with the vector space *V*. There is always a natural linear map from *V* to its double dual, given by evaluating a linear form in *V*^{∗} against a vector in *V*. This linear mapping is an isomorphism in finite dimensions, and it is often then expedient to identify *V* with its double dual.

For some mathematical applications, a more abstract approach is sometimes useful. This can be achieved by defining tensors in terms of elements of tensor products of vector spaces, which in turn are defined through a universal property. A type (*p*, *q*) tensor is defined in this context as an element of the tensor product of vector spaces,^{[6]}^{[7]}

Using the properties of the tensor product, it can be shown that these components satisfy the transformation law for a type (*p*, *q*) tensor. Moreover, the universal property of the tensor product gives a 1-to-1 correspondence between tensors defined in this way and tensors defined as multilinear maps.

This 1 to 1 correspondence can be archived the following way, because in the finite dimensional case there exists a canonical isomorphism between a vectorspace and its double dual:

Tensor products can be defined in great generality – for example, involving arbitrary modules over a ring. In principle, one could define a "tensor" simply to be an element of any tensor product. However, the mathematics literature usually reserves the term *tensor* for an element of a tensor product of any number of copies of a single vector space *V* and its dual, as above.

This discussion of tensors so far assumes finite dimensionality of the spaces involved, where the spaces of tensors obtained by each of these constructions are naturally isomorphic.^{[Note 2]} Constructions of spaces of tensors based on the tensor product and multilinear mappings can be generalized, essentially without modification, to vector bundles or coherent sheaves.^{[9]} For infinite-dimensional vector spaces, inequivalent topologies lead to inequivalent notions of tensor, and these various isomorphisms may or may not hold depending on what exactly is meant by a tensor (see topological tensor product). In some applications, it is the tensor product of Hilbert spaces that is intended, whose properties are the most similar to the finite-dimensional case. A more modern view is that it is the tensors' structure as a symmetric monoidal category that encodes their most important properties, rather than the specific models of those categories.^{[10]}

In many applications, especially in differential geometry and physics, it is natural to consider a tensor with components that are functions of the point in a space. This was the setting of Ricci's original work. In modern mathematical terminology such an object is called a tensor field, often referred to simply as a tensor.^{[1]}

In this context, a coordinate basis is often chosen for the tangent vector space. The transformation law may then be expressed in terms of partial derivatives of the coordinate functions,

This table shows important examples of tensors on vector spaces and tensor fields on manifolds. The tensors are classified according to their type (*n*, *m*), where *n* is the number of contravariant indices, *m* is the number of covariant indices, and *n* + *m* gives the total order of the tensor. For example, a bilinear form is the same thing as a (0, 2)-tensor; an inner product is an example of a (0, 2)-tensor, but not all (0, 2)-tensors are inner products. In the (0, *M*)-entry of the table, *M* denotes the dimensionality of the underlying vector space or manifold because for each dimension of the space, a separate index is needed to select that dimension to get a maximally covariant antisymmetric tensor.

Raising an index on an (*n*, *m*)-tensor produces an (*n* + 1, *m* − 1)-tensor; this corresponds to moving diagonally down and to the left on the table. Symmetrically, lowering an index corresponds to moving diagonally up and to the right on the table. Contraction of an upper with a lower index of an (*n*, *m*)-tensor produces an (*n* − 1, *m* − 1)-tensor; this corresponds to moving diagonally up and to the left on the table.

Because the components of vectors and their duals transform differently under the change of their dual bases, there is a covariant and/or contravariant transformation law that relates the arrays, which represent the tensor with respect to one basis and that with respect to the other one. The numbers of, respectively, vectors: n (contravariant indices) and dual vectors: m (covariant indices) in the input and output of a tensor determine the *type* (or *valence*) of the tensor, a pair of natural numbers (*n*, *m*), which determine the precise form of the transformation law. The *order* of a tensor is the sum of these two numbers.

The collection of tensors on a vector space and its dual forms a tensor algebra, which allows products of arbitrary tensors. Simple applications of tensors of order 2, which can be represented as a square matrix, can be solved by clever arrangement of transposed vectors and by applying the rules of matrix multiplication, but the tensor product should not be confused with this.

There are several notational systems that are used to describe tensors and perform calculations involving them.

Ricci calculus is the modern formalism and notation for tensor indices: indicating inner and outer products, covariance and contravariance, summations of tensor components, symmetry and antisymmetry, and partial and covariant derivatives.

The Einstein summation convention dispenses with writing summation signs, leaving the summation implicit. Any repeated index symbol is summed over: if the index i is used twice in a given term of a tensor expression, it means that the term is to be summed for all i. Several distinct pairs of indices may be summed this way.

Penrose graphical notation is a diagrammatic notation which replaces the symbols for tensors with shapes, and their indices by lines and curves. It is independent of basis elements, and requires no symbols for the indices.

The abstract index notation is a way to write tensors such that the indices are no longer thought of as numerical, but rather are indeterminates. This notation captures the expressiveness of indices and the basis-independence of index-free notation.

A component-free treatment of tensors uses notation that emphasises that tensors do not rely on any basis, and is defined in terms of the tensor product of vector spaces.

There are several operations on tensors that again produce a tensor. The linear nature of tensor implies that two tensors of the same type may be added together, and that tensors may be multiplied by a scalar with results analogous to the scaling of a vector. On components, these operations are simply performed component-wise. These operations do not change the type of the tensor; but there are also operations that produce a tensor of different type.

The tensor product takes two tensors, *S* and *T*, and produces a new tensor, *S* ⊗ *T*, whose order is the sum of the orders of the original tensors. When described as multilinear maps, the tensor product simply multiplies the two tensors, i.e.

which again produces a map that is linear in all its arguments. On components, the effect is to multiply the components of the two input tensors pairwise, i.e.

If S is of type (*l*, *k*) and T is of type (*n*, *m*), then the tensor product *S* ⊗ *T* has type (*l* + *n*, *k* + *m*).

The contraction is often used in conjunction with the tensor product to contract an index from each tensor.

When a vector space is equipped with a nondegenerate bilinear form (or *metric tensor* as it is often called in this context), operations can be defined that convert a contravariant (upper) index into a covariant (lower) index and vice versa. A metric tensor is a (symmetric) (0, 2)-tensor; it is thus possible to contract an upper index of a tensor with one of the lower indices of the metric tensor in the product. This produces a new tensor with the same index structure as the previous tensor, but with lower index generally shown in the same position of the contracted upper index. This operation is quite graphically known as *lowering an index*.

Conversely, the inverse operation can be defined, and is called *raising an index*. This is equivalent to a similar contraction on the product with a (2, 0)-tensor. This *inverse metric tensor* has components that are the matrix inverse of those of the metric tensor.

Important examples are provided by continuum mechanics. The stresses inside a solid body or fluid^{[14]} are described by a tensor field. The stress tensor and strain tensor are both second-order tensor fields, and are related in a general linear elastic material by a fourth-order elasticity tensor field. In detail, the tensor quantifying stress in a 3-dimensional solid object has components that can be conveniently represented as a 3 × 3 array. The three faces of a cube-shaped infinitesimal volume segment of the solid are each subject to some given force. The force's vector components are also three in number. Thus, 3 × 3, or 9 components are required to describe the stress at this cube-shaped infinitesimal segment. Within the bounds of this solid is a whole mass of varying stress quantities, each requiring 9 quantities to describe. Thus, a second-order tensor is needed.

If a particular surface element inside the material is singled out, the material on one side of the surface will apply a force on the other side. In general, this force will not be orthogonal to the surface, but it will depend on the orientation of the surface in a linear manner. This is described by a tensor of type (2, 0), in linear elasticity, or more precisely by a tensor field of type (2, 0), since the stresses may vary from point to point.

The concept of a tensor of order two is often conflated with that of a matrix. Tensors of higher order do however capture ideas important in science and engineering, as has been shown successively in numerous areas as they develop. This happens, for instance, in the field of computer vision, with the trifocal tensor generalizing the fundamental matrix.

The field of nonlinear optics studies the changes to material polarization density under extreme electric fields. The polarization waves generated are related to the generating electric fields through the nonlinear susceptibility tensor. If the polarization **P** is not linearly proportional to the electric field **E**, the medium is termed *nonlinear*. To a good approximation (for sufficiently weak fields, assuming no permanent dipole moments are present), **P** is given by a Taylor series in **E** whose coefficients are the nonlinear susceptibilities:

The vector spaces of a tensor product need not be the same, and sometimes the elements of such a more general tensor product are called "tensors". For example, an element of the tensor product space *V* ⊗ *W* is a second-order "tensor" in this more general sense,^{[15]} and an order-*d* tensor may likewise be defined as an element of a tensor product of *d* different vector spaces.^{[16]} A type (*n*, *m*) tensor, in the sense defined previously, is also a tensor of order *n* + *m* in this more general sense. The concept of tensor product can be extended to arbitrary modules over a ring.

The notion of a tensor can be generalized in a variety of ways to infinite dimensions. One, for instance, is via the tensor product of Hilbert spaces.^{[17]} Another way of generalizing the idea of tensor, common in nonlinear analysis, is via the multilinear maps definition where instead of using finite-dimensional vector spaces and their algebraic duals, one uses infinite-dimensional Banach spaces and their continuous dual.^{[18]} Tensors thus live naturally on Banach manifolds^{[19]} and Fréchet manifolds.

Suppose that a homogeneous medium fills **R**^{3}, so that the density of the medium is described by a single scalar value *ρ* in kg m^{−3}. The mass, in kg, of a region Ω is obtained by multiplying ρ by the volume of the region Ω, or equivalently integrating the constant *ρ* over the region:

where the Cartesian coordinates *xyz* are measured in m. If the units of length are changed into cm, then the numerical values of the coordinate functions must be rescaled by a factor of 100:

More generally, if the Cartesian coordinates *xyz* undergo a linear transformation, then the numerical value of the density ρ must change by a factor of the reciprocal of the absolute value of the determinant of the coordinate transformation, so that the integral remains invariant, by the change of variables formula for integration. Such a quantity that scales by the reciprocal of the absolute value of the determinant of the coordinate transition map is called a scalar density. To model a non-constant density, ρ is a function of the variables *xyz* (a scalar field), and under a curvilinear change of coordinates, it transforms by the reciprocal of the Jacobian of the coordinate change. For more on the intrinsic meaning, see Density on a manifold.

A tensor density transforms like a tensor under a coordinate change, except that it in addition picks up a factor of the absolute value of the determinant of the coordinate transition:^{[20]}

Here *w* is called the weight. In general, any tensor multiplied by a power of this function or its absolute value is called a tensor density, or a weighted tensor.^{[21]}^{[22]} An example of a tensor density is the current density of electromagnetism.

Under an affine transformation of the coordinates, a tensor transforms by the linear part of the transformation itself (or its inverse) on each index. These come from the rational representations of the general linear group. But this is not quite the most general linear transformation law that such an object may have: tensor densities are non-rational, but are still semisimple representations. A further class of transformations come from the logarithmic representation of the general linear group, a reducible but not semisimple representation,^{[23]} consisting of an (*x*,*y*) ∈ **R**^{2} with the transformation law

The transformation law for a tensor behaves as a functor on the category of admissible coordinate systems, under general linear transformations (or, other transformations within some class, such as local diffeomorphisms.) This makes a tensor a special case of a geometrical object, in the technical sense that it is a function of the coordinate system transforming functorially under coordinate changes.^{[24]} Examples of objects obeying more general kinds of transformation laws are jets and, more generally still, natural bundles.^{[25]}^{[26]}

When changing from one orthonormal basis (called a *frame*) to another by a rotation, the components of a tensor transform by that same rotation. This transformation does not depend on the path taken through the space of frames. However, the space of frames is not simply connected (see orientation entanglement and plate trick): there are continuous paths in the space of frames with the same beginning and ending configurations that are not deformable one into the other. It is possible to attach an additional discrete invariant to each frame that incorporates this path dependence, and which turns out (locally) to have values of ±1.^{[27]} A spinor is an object that transforms like a tensor under rotations in the frame, apart from a possible sign that is determined by the value of this discrete invariant.^{[28]}^{[29]}

Succinctly, spinors are elements of the spin representation of the rotation group, while tensors are elements of its tensor representations. Other classical groups have tensor representations, and so also tensors that are compatible with the group, but all non-compact classical groups have infinite-dimensional unitary representations as well.

The concepts of later tensor analysis arose from the work of Carl Friedrich Gauss in differential geometry, and the formulation was much influenced by the theory of algebraic forms and invariants developed during the middle of the nineteenth century.^{[30]} The word "tensor" itself was introduced in 1846 by William Rowan Hamilton^{[31]} to describe something different from what is now meant by a tensor.^{[Note 3]} The contemporary usage was introduced by Woldemar Voigt in 1898.^{[32]}

Tensor calculus was developed around 1890 by Gregorio Ricci-Curbastro under the title *absolute differential calculus*, and originally presented by Ricci-Curbastro in 1892.^{[33]} It was made accessible to many mathematicians by the publication of Ricci-Curbastro and Tullio Levi-Civita's 1900 classic text *Méthodes de calcul différentiel absolu et leurs applications* (Methods of absolute differential calculus and their applications).^{[34]}

In the 20th century, the subject came to be known as *tensor analysis*, and achieved broader acceptance with the introduction of Einstein's theory of general relativity, around 1915. General relativity is formulated completely in the language of tensors. Einstein had learned about them, with great difficulty, from the geometer Marcel Grossmann.^{[35]} Levi-Civita then initiated a correspondence with Einstein to correct mistakes Einstein had made in his use of tensor analysis. The correspondence lasted 1915–17, and was characterized by mutual respect:

I admire the elegance of your method of computation; it must be nice to ride through these fields upon the horse of true mathematics while the like of us have to make our way laboriously on foot.

Tensors were also found to be useful in other fields such as continuum mechanics. Some well-known examples of tensors in differential geometry are quadratic forms such as metric tensors, and the Riemann curvature tensor. The exterior algebra of Hermann Grassmann, from the middle of the nineteenth century, is itself a tensor theory, and highly geometric, but it was some time before it was seen, with the theory of differential forms, as naturally unified with tensor calculus. The work of Élie Cartan made differential forms one of the basic kinds of tensors used in mathematics.

From about the 1920s onwards, it was realised that tensors play a basic role in algebraic topology (for example in the Künneth theorem).^{[37]} Correspondingly there are types of tensors at work in many branches of abstract algebra, particularly in homological algebra and representation theory. Multilinear algebra can be developed in greater generality than for scalars coming from a field. For example, scalars can come from a ring. But the theory is then less geometric and computations more technical and less algorithmic.^{[38]} Tensors are generalized within category theory by means of the concept of monoidal category, from the 1960s.^{[39]}